thorondraco wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:13 pmmakin found more than one? That is a bit... obsessed maybe? Maybe he just got lucky.
^
there were three toblerones in the taiwan box. makin took two, used one, and rehid the other in japan
thorondraco wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:13 pmmakin found more than one? That is a bit... obsessed maybe? Maybe he just got lucky.
^
Gotcha.furrylatula wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:13 pmthorondraco wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:13 pmmakin found more than one? That is a bit... obsessed maybe? Maybe he just got lucky.^
there were three toblerones in the taiwan box. makin took two, used one, and rehid the other in japan
This would be appreciated from me as well, yeah.MorganMustDie wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 5:43 pmmaybe this is just me but I'd like for someone to wish for clarity on what groceries Droog ended up buying
we (or at least i, and probably others) would ignore it, because its a candy bar, and there's no real reason to take people engaging the game in bad faith seriously when I could just be making/consuming more cool June content. (Which, in my mind, is the actual thing that makes June Egbert real, not the simple act of finding a bit of chocolate).
I've seen sentiments to the effect that strange eboys distributing toblerones is no basis for a system of franchise governance. I'm actually sympathetic to that. I am, after all, working on a large scale guide to creating shared world fiction, and, spoiler alert, I actually think something like a parliamentary system is a pretty good idea for a large scale shared world project. It's true that if canon was determined just by who got to the toblerone first, that could result in some shitty scenarios, like people canonizing transphobic things instead of trans-affirming ones.
Except, that's not... really what happened? At all? Andrew didn't determine from the outset that whoever found the toblerones would literally be the new Andrew Hussie. In that sense, yeah, his response was what you might call "a joke". Or, it's what you might call a game, not a game bound by specific rules of play but a game of absurd pretend. And one of the nice things about a game like that is if a player is being an asshole, neither Andrew nor anyone else are obligated to keep playing the game with them. It's weird to me that this obviously critical aspect of consent has eluded a number of commentators!
That's such a powermove I've now convinced myself that if I ever get a toberlone that will be my wishBrobyDDark wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:00 pmIf I had found it and had that weight on my shoulders I'd just eat it. Or demand Andrew hide something richer in protein, like slim-jims.
Now:There's not much of a chance of it becoming cemented as an opus, or casting a shadow from which I cannot escape.
We live in dark times, men